Variability in Emergency Department Procedure Rates and Distributions in a Regional Health System: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Procedural competency is essential to the practice of emergency medicine. However, there are limited data quantifying emergency department procedural volumes to inform the work of educators and credentialing bodies. In this study, we characterize procedural scope and volume in a regional health care system and compare rates between practice settings and over time. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were acquired from electronic medical records of a regional health care system from March 2017 through February 2022. Nonspecific entries, esoteric procedures, and nonprocedural clinical skills were excluded. Procedural rates were compared: (1) between academic and community hospitals, (2) across study years, and (3) across seasons. Analyses were repeated for pediatric encounters, and with study year 4 removed to assess the influence of the first year of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on results. RESULTS: There were 131,976 instances of 40 qualifying procedures in 1,979,935 unique visits across 9 EDs. Several high-acuity procedures had similar rates in academic and community settings, including cardiac pacing, cricothyrotomy, and lateral canthotomy. Year-over-year procedural rates were stable or increasing for most procedures, with a notable exception of lumbar puncture. Most procedures did not have significant seasonal variation, and most findings were stable when study year 4 was removed from the analysis. CONCLUSION: All procedures were performed in all settings and rates of several emergent procedures were similar in both settings, underscoring the importance of broad procedural competence for all emergency physicians. Educators and credentialing organizations can use these data to inform decisions regarding curriculum design and certification requirements.

Virtual student experiences: A case study of objectives, outcomes, and anticipated consequences.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, most in-person visiting clerkship opportunities have been canceled. Many institutions have developed virtual experiences to fill this void; however, the format and objectives of these experiences are variable. This article describes an education intervention for visiting students where both learner-oriented and program-oriented outcomes of a nonclerkship virtual student experience are explored. This intervention consisted of five 1-hour case-based teaching sessions in addition to attendance at weekly residency conference over a 1-week period. The primary outcomes were student ratings of how the experience impacted their 1) perception of the program's educational environment and culture, 2) medical knowledge, and 3) program ranking before and after the experience. Of 24 participants, 15 students (63%) completed the final evaluation, all with positive summative rankings in every domain measured. Of the 15 respondents, 12 (80%) reported an increase in where they would rank the program after the experience compared to before, and nine of 15 (60%) stated that they would rank the program #1 if making a list at the time they completed the final evaluation. Future study should examine long-term outcomes of these interventions including decisions regarding where students apply, who programs interview, and ranking decisions of students and programs.

Beyond the emergency department: Effects of COVID-19 on emergency medicine resident education.

BACKGROUND: In December 2019, a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) caused widespread clinical disease, triggering limited in-person gatherings and social-distancing guidelines to minimize transmission. These regulations led most emergency medicine (EM) residency training programs to rapidly transition to virtual didactics. We sought to evaluate EM resident perceptions of the effects of COVID-19 on their didactic and clinical education. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey study at seven EM residency programs using a mixed-methods approach designed to understand resident perceptions regarding the impact of COVID-19 on their educational experience. Quantitative data were presented as percentages with comparison of subgroups, while open-ended responses were analyzed using qualitative methodology. RESULTS: We achieved a 59% response rate (187/313). The majority of respondents (119/182, 65.4%) reported that the COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on their residency education with junior residents disproportionately affected. A total of 81 of 182 (44.5%) participants reported that one or more of their clinical rotations were partially or completely canceled due to the pandemic. Additionally, we identified four themes and 34 subthemes highlighting the contextual effects of the pandemic, which were then divided into positive and negative influences on the residency experience. The four themes include systems experience, clinical experience, didactic experience, and wellness. CONCLUSION: Our study examined the impact of COVID-19 on residents' educational experiences. We found overall mixed responses with a slightly negative impact on residency education, wellness, and clinical rotations, while satisfaction with EM as a career choice was increased. Factors influencing this included systems, clinical, and didactic experiences as well as overall wellness.

Rethinking Residency Conferences in the Era of COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic requires a substantial change to the traditional approach to conference didactics. Switching to a virtual medium for conference sessions presents several challenges, particularly with regard to aspects that rely heavily on in-person components (e.g., simulation, ultrasound). This paper will discuss the challenges and strategies to address them for conference planning in the era of COVID-19.